Denmark vs Iceland: Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency)
Denmark
12.82 million units per square kilometre
in 2008
Iceland
14.68 million units per square kilometre
in 2007
Denmark rank
25th
Iceland rank
23rd
Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) over time
- Denmark
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 14.68 million units per square kilometre against 12.82 million units per square kilometre in Denmark, a difference of 1.86 million units per square kilometre.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Denmark's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 8 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Denmark ahead.
Denmark ranks 25th and Iceland ranks 23rd of 150 countries.
Denmark has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), Denmark or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 14.68 million units per square kilometre against 12.82 million units per square kilometre in Denmark as of 2007.
- What is the difference in capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) between Denmark and Iceland?
- 1.86 million units per square kilometre, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Iceland?
- 8 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2007.
- How do Denmark and Iceland rank globally for capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency)?
- Denmark ranks 25th and Iceland ranks 23rd of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Statizoid (derived), published as Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.