Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania: Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency)

Saint Kitts and Nevis
2.17 million units per square kilometre
in 2008
Tanzania
1.70 million units per square kilometre
in 2008
Saint Kitts and Nevis rank
54th
Tanzania rank
57th

Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) over time

  • Saint Kitts and Nevis
  • Tanzania
01.0M2.0M196719872008

How they compare

Saint Kitts and Nevis currently reports 2.17 million units per square kilometre against 1.70 million units per square kilometre in Tanzania, a difference of 477,560 units per square kilometre.

That makes Saint Kitts and Nevis's figure about 1.3 times Tanzania's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1979 it was Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.

Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 54th and Tanzania ranks 57th of 150 countries.

Saint Kitts and Nevis has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Kitts and Nevis Tanzania Difference Ahead
1970s 20,823 units per square kilometre 1,104 units per square kilometre 19,719 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1980s 67,007 units per square kilometre -6,968 units per square kilometre 73,974 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
1990s 237,182 units per square kilometre -113,268 units per square kilometre 350,450 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis
2000s 1.04 million units per square kilometre 856,602 units per square kilometre 180,781 units per square kilometre Saint Kitts and Nevis

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency), Saint Kitts and Nevis or Tanzania?
Saint Kitts and Nevis, at 2.17 million units per square kilometre against 1.70 million units per square kilometre in Tanzania as of 2008.
What is the difference in capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency) between Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania?
477,560 units per square kilometre, with Saint Kitts and Nevis ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania?
30 years are reported by both, from 1979 to 2008.
How do Saint Kitts and Nevis and Tanzania rank globally for capital accounts (depository corporations survey, domestic currency)?
Saint Kitts and Nevis ranks 54th and Tanzania ranks 57th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Statizoid (derived), published as Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania: Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid, drawing on Statizoid (derived). Retrieved 18 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/capital-accounts-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/tanzania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page; please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/capital-accounts-depository-corporations-survey-domestic-currency-per-square-kilometre/st-kitts-and-nevis/tanzania/">Saint Kitts and Nevis vs Tanzania: Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency)</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency), per square kilometre
Unit
units per square kilometre
Source
Statizoid (derived)
Licence
Derived by Statizoid from the sources named on the page
Coverage
150 places, 5,262 data points, 1961–2023
Last refreshed

Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency) divided by Land area (sq. km), matched on country and year. Neither publisher issues this ratio as a series; it is computed here from both.