Iceland vs Pakistan: Capital Accounts
Iceland
1.47 trillion
in 2007
Pakistan
1.00 trillion
in 2007
Iceland rank
29th
Pakistan rank
32nd
Capital Accounts over time
- Iceland
- Pakistan
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 1.47 trillion against 1.00 trillion in Pakistan, a difference of 468.66 billion.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.5 times Pakistan's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 44 shared years of data; in 1964 it was Pakistan ahead.
Iceland ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 32nd of 155 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Pakistan in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 13.52 million | 152.08 million | 138.57 million | Pakistan |
| 1970s | 76.90 million | 667.75 million | 590.85 million | Pakistan |
| 1980s | 8.64 billion | 11.13 billion | 2.49 billion | Pakistan |
| 1990s | 40.48 billion | 24.72 billion | 15.76 billion | Iceland |
| 2000s | 505.78 billion | 329.78 billion | 176.00 billion | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher capital accounts, Iceland or Pakistan?
- Iceland, at 1.47 trillion against 1.00 trillion in Pakistan as of 2007.
- What is the difference in capital accounts between Iceland and Pakistan?
- 468.66 billion, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Pakistan?
- 44 years are reported by both, from 1964 to 2007.
- How do Iceland and Pakistan rank globally for capital accounts?
- Iceland ranks 29th and Pakistan ranks 32nd of 155 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Capital Accounts (Depository Corporations Survey, Domestic currency). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
The Monetary and Financial Statistics (MFS), Non-standard dataset provides discontinued, vintage country-reported financial data that are not harmonized and use country-specific terms.