Austria vs New Zealand: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time
- Austria
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 0.5943 against 0.5419 in Austria, a difference of 0.0524.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Austria's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Austria ahead.
Austria ranks 16th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Austria averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Austria | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.5892 | 0.4938 | 0.0954 | Austria |
| 2030s | 0.6057 | 0.539 | 0.0667 | Austria |
| 2040s | 0.5586 | 0.5552 | 0.0034 | Austria |
| 2050s | 0.5419 | 0.5943 | 0.0524 | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Austria or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 0.5943 against 0.5419 in Austria as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Austria and New Zealand?
- 0.0524, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and New Zealand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Austria and New Zealand rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
- Austria ranks 16th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.