Belgium vs Canada: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time
- Belgium
- Canada
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 0.1767 against 0.1403 in Canada, a difference of 0.0364.
That makes Belgium's figure about 1.3 times Canada's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Canada ahead.
Belgium ranks 34th and Canada ranks 35th of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 3 and Canada in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.2321 | 0.2572 | 0.0252 | Canada |
| 2030s | 0.2525 | 0.2169 | 0.0356 | Belgium |
| 2040s | 0.2063 | 0.1592 | 0.0472 | Belgium |
| 2050s | 0.1767 | 0.1403 | 0.0364 | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Belgium or Canada?
- Belgium, at 0.1767 against 0.1403 in Canada as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Belgium and Canada?
- 0.0364, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Canada?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Belgium and Canada rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
- Belgium ranks 34th and Canada ranks 35th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.