Belgium vs Chinese Taipei: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time
- Belgium
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 0.1956 against 0.1767 in Belgium, a difference of 0.0189.
That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 1.1 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Chinese Taipei ahead.
Belgium ranks 34th and Chinese Taipei ranks 31st of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Chinese Taipei in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.2321 | 0.2631 | 0.0311 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2030s | 0.2525 | 0.2471 | 0.0054 | Belgium |
| 2040s | 0.2063 | 0.2156 | 0.0092 | Chinese Taipei |
| 2050s | 0.1767 | 0.1956 | 0.0189 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Belgium or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 0.1956 against 0.1767 in Belgium as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Belgium and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.0189, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Chinese Taipei?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Belgium and Chinese Taipei rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
- Belgium ranks 34th and Chinese Taipei ranks 31st of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.