Canada vs Sweden: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time
- Canada
- Sweden
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0.1403 against 0.1315 in Sweden, a difference of 0.0088.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.1 times Sweden's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.
Canada ranks 35th and Sweden ranks 36th of 39 countries.
Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Canada | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.2572 | 0.1679 | 0.0893 | Canada |
| 2030s | 0.2169 | 0.1578 | 0.0591 | Canada |
| 2040s | 0.1592 | 0.1456 | 0.0135 | Canada |
| 2050s | 0.1403 | 0.1315 | 0.0088 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Canada or Sweden?
- Canada, at 0.1403 against 0.1315 in Sweden as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Canada and Sweden?
- 0.0088, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and Sweden?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Canada and Sweden rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
- Canada ranks 35th and Sweden ranks 36th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.