Chile vs Emerging and Developing Asia: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor

Chile
0.6118
in 2050
Emerging and Developing Asia
0.2534
in 2050
Chile rank
13th
Emerging and Developing Asia rank
11th

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time

  • Chile
  • Emerging and Developing Asia
00.20.40.6202520372050

How they compare

Chile currently reports 0.6118 against 0.2534 in Emerging and Developing Asia, a difference of 0.3584.

That makes Chile's figure about 2.4 times Emerging and Developing Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Emerging and Developing Asia ahead.

Chile ranks 13th and Emerging and Developing Asia ranks 11th of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 3 and Emerging and Developing Asia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Chile Emerging and Developing Asia Difference Ahead
2020s 0.6134 0.6459 0.0325 Emerging and Developing Asia
2030s 0.5835 0.4788 0.1047 Chile
2040s 0.5617 0.3059 0.2558 Chile
2050s 0.6118 0.2534 0.3584 Chile

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Chile or Emerging and Developing Asia?
Chile, at 0.6118 against 0.2534 in Emerging and Developing Asia as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Chile and Emerging and Developing Asia?
0.3584, with Chile ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Emerging and Developing Asia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Chile and Emerging and Developing Asia rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
Chile ranks 13th and Emerging and Developing Asia ranks 11th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Chile vs Emerging and Developing Asia: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/chile/emerging-and-developing-asia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/chile/emerging-and-developing-asia/">Chile vs Emerging and Developing Asia: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.