Denmark vs Emerging and Developing Europe: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor

Denmark
2.34
in 2050
Emerging and Developing Europe
1.61
in 2050
Denmark rank
2nd
Emerging and Developing Europe rank
1st

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time

  • Denmark
  • Emerging and Developing Europe
00.511.522.5202520372050

How they compare

Denmark currently reports 2.34 against 1.61 in Emerging and Developing Europe, a difference of 0.73.

That makes Denmark's figure about 1.5 times Emerging and Developing Europe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Emerging and Developing Europe ahead.

Denmark ranks 2nd and Emerging and Developing Europe ranks 1st of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Denmark averaged higher in 3 and Emerging and Developing Europe in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Denmark Emerging and Developing Europe Difference Ahead
2020s 1.32 1.63 0.305 Emerging and Developing Europe
2030s 1.82 1.64 0.1766 Denmark
2040s 2.24 1.63 0.612 Denmark
2050s 2.34 1.61 0.7296 Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Denmark or Emerging and Developing Europe?
Denmark, at 2.34 against 1.61 in Emerging and Developing Europe as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Denmark and Emerging and Developing Europe?
0.73, with Denmark ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Denmark and Emerging and Developing Europe?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Denmark and Emerging and Developing Europe rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
Denmark ranks 2nd and Emerging and Developing Europe ranks 1st of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Denmark vs Emerging and Developing Europe: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/denmark/emerging-and-developing-europe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/denmark/emerging-and-developing-europe/">Denmark vs Emerging and Developing Europe: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.