Emerging and Developing Asia vs New Zealand: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor

Emerging and Developing Asia
0.2534
in 2050
New Zealand
0.5943
in 2050
Emerging and Developing Asia rank
11th
New Zealand rank
14th

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time

  • Emerging and Developing Asia
  • New Zealand
00.20.40.6202520372050

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 0.5943 against 0.2534 in Emerging and Developing Asia, a difference of 0.3409.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 2.3 times Emerging and Developing Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Emerging and Developing Asia ahead.

Emerging and Developing Asia ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 12 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Emerging and Developing Asia averaged higher in 1 and New Zealand in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Emerging and Developing Asia New Zealand Difference Ahead
2020s 0.6459 0.4938 0.1521 Emerging and Developing Asia
2030s 0.4788 0.539 0.0602 New Zealand
2040s 0.3059 0.5552 0.2494 New Zealand
2050s 0.2534 0.5943 0.3409 New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Emerging and Developing Asia or New Zealand?
New Zealand, at 0.5943 against 0.2534 in Emerging and Developing Asia as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Emerging and Developing Asia and New Zealand?
0.3409, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Emerging and Developing Asia and New Zealand?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Emerging and Developing Asia and New Zealand rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
Emerging and Developing Asia ranks 11th and New Zealand ranks 14th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Emerging and Developing Asia vs New Zealand: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/emerging-and-developing-asia/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/emerging-and-developing-asia/new-zealand/">Emerging and Developing Asia vs New Zealand: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.