Germany vs Singapore: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor

Germany
0.2628
in 2050
Singapore
0.3849
in 2050
Germany rank
25th
Singapore rank
23rd

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time

  • Germany
  • Singapore
0.10.20.30.4202520372050

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 0.3849 against 0.2628 in Germany, a difference of 0.1221.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.5 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Germany ahead.

Germany ranks 25th and Singapore ranks 23rd of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Germany averaged higher in 2 and Singapore in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Singapore Difference Ahead
2020s 0.3887 0.1443 0.2444 Germany
2030s 0.3611 0.2107 0.1503 Germany
2040s 0.2891 0.3138 0.0248 Singapore
2050s 0.2628 0.3849 0.1221 Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Germany or Singapore?
Singapore, at 0.3849 against 0.2628 in Germany as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Germany and Singapore?
0.1221, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Germany and Singapore rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
Germany ranks 25th and Singapore ranks 23rd of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Singapore: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 13 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/germany/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/germany/singapore/">Germany vs Singapore: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.