Greece vs Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC): Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor

Greece
3.81
in 2050
Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
0.6372
in 2050
Greece rank
1st
Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) rank
3rd

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time

  • Greece
  • Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)
01234202520372050

How they compare

Greece currently reports 3.81 against 0.6372 in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC), a difference of 3.17.

That makes Greece's figure about 6.0 times Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)'s.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.

Greece ranks 1st and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) ranks 3rd of 39 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) Difference Ahead
2020s 2.95 0.5037 2.45 Greece
2030s 3.56 0.5453 3.01 Greece
2040s 3.8 0.5908 3.21 Greece
2050s 3.81 0.6372 3.18 Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Greece or Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)?
Greece, at 3.81 against 0.6372 in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Greece and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)?
3.17, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC)?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Greece and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
Greece ranks 1st and Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC) ranks 3rd of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greece vs Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC): Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/greece/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-lac/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/greece/latin-america-and-the-caribbean-lac/">Greece vs Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC): Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.