Korea vs United States: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time
- Korea
- United States
How they compare
Korea currently reports 0.1935 against 0.1818 in United States, a difference of 0.0117.
That makes Korea's figure about 1.1 times United States's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was United States ahead.
Korea ranks 32nd and United States ranks 33rd of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 1 and United States in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.1954 | 0.3401 | 0.1448 | United States |
| 2030s | 0.1848 | 0.2832 | 0.0984 | United States |
| 2040s | 0.1926 | 0.2023 | 0.0096 | United States |
| 2050s | 0.1935 | 0.1818 | 0.0117 | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Korea or United States?
- Korea, at 0.1935 against 0.1818 in United States as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Korea and United States?
- 0.0117, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and United States?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Korea and United States rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
- Korea ranks 32nd and United States ranks 33rd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.