Middle East and Central Asia vs Russia: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor

Middle East and Central Asia
1.53
in 2050
Russia
1.71
in 2050
Middle East and Central Asia rank
2nd
Russia rank
4th

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time

  • Middle East and Central Asia
  • Russia
00.511.522.5202520372050

How they compare

Russia currently reports 1.71 against 1.53 in Middle East and Central Asia, a difference of 0.18.

That makes Russia's figure about 1.1 times Middle East and Central Asia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Middle East and Central Asia ahead.

Middle East and Central Asia ranks 2nd and Russia ranks 4th of 12 groups.

Across the 4 decades both report, Middle East and Central Asia averaged higher in 3 and Russia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Middle East and Central Asia Russia Difference Ahead
2020s 2.16 1.55 0.6047 Middle East and Central Asia
2030s 2.17 1.58 0.5874 Middle East and Central Asia
2040s 1.77 1.66 0.1061 Middle East and Central Asia
2050s 1.53 1.71 0.1817 Russia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Middle East and Central Asia or Russia?
Russia, at 1.71 against 1.53 in Middle East and Central Asia as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Middle East and Central Asia and Russia?
0.18, with Russia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Middle East and Central Asia and Russia?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Middle East and Central Asia and Russia rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
Middle East and Central Asia ranks 2nd and Russia ranks 4th of 12 groups.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Middle East and Central Asia vs Russia: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 November 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/middle-east-and-central-asia/russian-federation/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-adjusted-by-growth-factor-us-dollar-scope-1-not/middle-east-and-central-asia/russian-federation/">Middle East and Central Asia vs Russia: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.