Sweden vs United Kingdom: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor over time
- Sweden
- United Kingdom
How they compare
Sweden currently reports 0.1315 against 0.0991 in United Kingdom, a difference of 0.0324.
That makes Sweden's figure about 1.3 times United Kingdom's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Sweden has been ahead every year.
Sweden ranks 36th and United Kingdom ranks 39th of 39 countries.
Sweden has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sweden | United Kingdom | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.1679 | 0.1325 | 0.0354 | Sweden |
| 2030s | 0.1578 | 0.1284 | 0.0293 | Sweden |
| 2040s | 0.1456 | 0.1094 | 0.0363 | Sweden |
| 2050s | 0.1315 | 0.0991 | 0.0324 | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor, Sweden or United Kingdom?
- Sweden, at 0.1315 against 0.0991 in United Kingdom as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor between Sweden and United Kingdom?
- 0.0324, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sweden and United Kingdom?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Sweden and United Kingdom rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, adjusted by growth factor?
- Sweden ranks 36th and United Kingdom ranks 39th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, Adjusted by Growth Factor, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.