Australia vs Chinese Taipei: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Australia
- Chinese Taipei
How they compare
Chinese Taipei currently reports 0.6736 against 0.634 in Australia, a difference of 0.0396.
That makes Chinese Taipei's figure about 1.1 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 27th and Chinese Taipei ranks 26th of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Chinese Taipei in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Chinese Taipei | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.8003 | 0.3387 | 0.4616 | Australia |
| 2030s | 0.7159 | 0.4373 | 0.2786 | Australia |
| 2040s | 0.6287 | 0.5862 | 0.0425 | Australia |
| 2050s | 0.634 | 0.6736 | 0.0396 | Chinese Taipei |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Australia or Chinese Taipei?
- Chinese Taipei, at 0.6736 against 0.634 in Australia as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Australia and Chinese Taipei?
- 0.0396, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chinese Taipei?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Australia and Chinese Taipei rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Australia ranks 27th and Chinese Taipei ranks 26th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.