Belgium vs Canada: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Belgium
- Canada
How they compare
Canada currently reports 0.4151 against 0.3512 in Belgium, a difference of 0.0639.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Canada ahead.
Belgium ranks 37th and Canada ranks 35th of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Canada in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.2679 | 0.3152 | 0.0473 | Canada |
| 2030s | 0.3479 | 0.3468 | 0.0011 | Belgium |
| 2040s | 0.3587 | 0.3767 | 0.018 | Canada |
| 2050s | 0.3512 | 0.4151 | 0.0639 | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Belgium or Canada?
- Canada, at 0.4151 against 0.3512 in Belgium as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Belgium and Canada?
- 0.0639, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Canada?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Belgium and Canada rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Belgium ranks 37th and Canada ranks 35th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.