Canada vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar

Canada
0.4151
in 2050
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0.254
in 2050
Canada rank
35th
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank
38th

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time

  • Canada
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
0.10.20.30.4202520372050

How they compare

Canada currently reports 0.4151 against 0.254 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland, a difference of 0.1611.

That makes Canada's figure about 1.6 times United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Canada has been ahead every year.

Canada ranks 35th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 38th of 39 countries.

Canada has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Canada United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland Difference Ahead
2020s 0.3152 0.1589 0.1564 Canada
2030s 0.3468 0.1952 0.1516 Canada
2040s 0.3767 0.232 0.1447 Canada
2050s 0.4151 0.254 0.1611 Canada

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Canada or United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
Canada, at 0.4151 against 0.254 in United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Canada and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
0.1611, with Canada ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Canada and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Canada and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?
Canada ranks 35th and United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland ranks 38th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Canada vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 15 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/canada/united-kingdom/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/canada/united-kingdom/">Canada vs United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.