Chile vs Malaysia: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Chile
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports 1.85 against 1.57 in Chile, a difference of 0.28.
That makes Malaysia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
Across all 26 years both countries report, Malaysia has been ahead every year.
Chile ranks 14th and Malaysia ranks 11th of 39 countries.
Malaysia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.7376 | 0.8434 | 0.1059 | Malaysia |
| 2030s | 0.889 | 1.02 | 0.1284 | Malaysia |
| 2040s | 1.2 | 1.37 | 0.1698 | Malaysia |
| 2050s | 1.57 | 1.85 | 0.2823 | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Chile or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at 1.85 against 1.57 in Chile as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Chile and Malaysia?
- 0.28, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Malaysia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Chile and Malaysia rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Chile ranks 14th and Malaysia ranks 11th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.