Germany vs Chinese Taipei: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar

Germany
0.7242
in 2050
Chinese Taipei
0.6736
in 2050
Germany rank
24th
Chinese Taipei rank
26th

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time

  • Germany
  • Chinese Taipei
00.20.40.60.8202520372050

How they compare

Germany currently reports 0.7242 against 0.6736 in Chinese Taipei, a difference of 0.0506.

That makes Germany's figure about 1.1 times Chinese Taipei's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Germany has been ahead every year.

Germany ranks 24th and Chinese Taipei ranks 26th of 39 countries.

Germany has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Germany Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
2020s 0.4742 0.3387 0.1355 Germany
2030s 0.568 0.4373 0.1307 Germany
2040s 0.6513 0.5862 0.0651 Germany
2050s 0.7242 0.6736 0.0506 Germany

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Germany or Chinese Taipei?
Germany, at 0.7242 against 0.6736 in Chinese Taipei as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Germany and Chinese Taipei?
0.0506, with Germany ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Germany and Chinese Taipei?
26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Germany and Chinese Taipei rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?
Germany ranks 24th and Chinese Taipei ranks 26th of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Germany vs Chinese Taipei: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/germany/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/germany/taiwan/">Germany vs Chinese Taipei: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source
International Monetary Fund
Licence
IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage
51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.