How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Portugal?

26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.

Where does this data come from?

International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Hong Kong vs Portugal: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar

Hong Kong

0.4889

in 2050

Portugal

0.4566

in 2050

Hong Kong rank

31st

Portugal rank

33rd

Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time

Hong Kong
Portugal

How they compare

Hong Kong currently reports 0.4889 against 0.4566 in Portugal, a difference of 0.0323.

That makes Hong Kong's figure about 1.1 times Portugal's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Portugal ahead.

Hong Kong ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 33rd of 39 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade	Hong Kong	Portugal	Difference	Ahead
2020s	0.2514	0.4944	0.243	Portugal
2030s	0.2864	0.4534	0.167	Portugal
2040s	0.3644	0.3922	0.0279	Portugal
2050s	0.4889	0.4566	0.0323	Hong Kong

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Hong Kong or Portugal?: Hong Kong, at 0.4889 against 0.4566 in Portugal as of 2050.
What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Hong Kong and Portugal?: 0.0323, with Hong Kong ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Portugal?: 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
How do Hong Kong and Portugal rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?: Hong Kong ranks 31st and Portugal ranks 33rd of 39 countries.
Where does this data come from?: International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong vs Portugal: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar. Statizoid, drawing on International Monetary Fund. Retrieved 17 September 2026, from https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/hong-kong-sar-china/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://financial-sector.statizoid.com/compare/carbon-cost-to-assets-in-disclosing-firms-us-dollar-scope-1-not-applicable-below-2-c/hong-kong-sar-china/portugal/">Hong Kong vs Portugal: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C)
Source: International Monetary Fund
Licence: IMF Terms and Conditions (attribution required)
Coverage: 51 places, 1,326 data points, 2025–2050
Last refreshed: 18 August 2026

This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.