Hong Kong vs United States: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Hong Kong
- United States
How they compare
United States currently reports 0.5074 against 0.4889 in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.0185.
Across all 26 years both countries report, United States has been ahead every year.
Hong Kong ranks 31st and United States ranks 28th of 39 countries.
United States has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | United States | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.2514 | 0.421 | 0.1696 | United States |
| 2030s | 0.2864 | 0.4537 | 0.1673 | United States |
| 2040s | 0.3644 | 0.464 | 0.0996 | United States |
| 2050s | 0.4889 | 0.5074 | 0.0185 | United States |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Hong Kong or United States?
- United States, at 0.5074 against 0.4889 in Hong Kong as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Hong Kong and United States?
- 0.0185, with United States ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and United States?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Hong Kong and United States rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Hong Kong ranks 31st and United States ranks 28th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.