Italy vs Singapore: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Italy
- Singapore
How they compare
Singapore currently reports 0.8694 against 0.759 in Italy, a difference of 0.1104.
That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Italy's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Italy ahead.
Italy ranks 22nd and Singapore ranks 20th of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Italy averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Italy | Singapore | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.7203 | 0.1661 | 0.5543 | Italy |
| 2030s | 0.7315 | 0.2984 | 0.433 | Italy |
| 2040s | 0.6959 | 0.601 | 0.0949 | Italy |
| 2050s | 0.759 | 0.8694 | 0.1104 | Singapore |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Italy or Singapore?
- Singapore, at 0.8694 against 0.759 in Italy as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Italy and Singapore?
- 0.1104, with Singapore ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Singapore?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Italy and Singapore rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Italy ranks 22nd and Singapore ranks 20th of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.