Korea vs Netherlands: Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar
Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar over time
- Korea
- Netherlands
How they compare
Korea currently reports 0.5064 against 0.4827 in Netherlands, a difference of 0.0237.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 2025 it was Netherlands ahead.
Korea ranks 29th and Netherlands ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Korea averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Korea | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2020s | 0.2375 | 0.398 | 0.1605 | Netherlands |
| 2030s | 0.288 | 0.4807 | 0.1927 | Netherlands |
| 2040s | 0.421 | 0.4908 | 0.0698 | Netherlands |
| 2050s | 0.5064 | 0.4827 | 0.0237 | Korea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar, Korea or Netherlands?
- Korea, at 0.5064 against 0.4827 in Netherlands as of 2050.
- What is the difference in carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar between Korea and Netherlands?
- 0.0237, with Korea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Korea and Netherlands?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2025 to 2050.
- How do Korea and Netherlands rank globally for carbon cost to assets in disclosing firms, us dollar?
- Korea ranks 29th and Netherlands ranks 32nd of 39 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Cost to Assets in Disclosing Firms, US dollar (Scope 1, Not applicable, Below 2°C). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset measures the impact of evolving carbon costs on firms’ financial indicators under different transition scenarios. The impacts are aggregated across countries and industries. Carbon Cost to Revenues/Assets indicators give an indication of how high these taxes will be in alternative policy scenarios in comparison to revenues/assets of the disclosing firms, along the transition through 2050. Revenues/Assets at risk indicator shows the share of firms that are expected to be severely impacted by carbon costs under the selected transition scenarios. Each indicator is calculated under two different assumptions: i) constant assets/revenues; and ii) adjusted by growth factors.