Costa Rica vs Latvia: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities
Costa Rica
96.46
in 2018
Latvia
97.56
in 2018
Costa Rica rank
14th
Latvia rank
12th
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities over time
- Costa Rica
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 97.56 against 96.46 in Costa Rica, a difference of 1.1.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 14th and Latvia ranks 12th of 37 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 226.47 | 63.63 | 162.84 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 128.68 | 88.2 | 40.48 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities, Costa Rica or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 97.56 against 96.46 in Costa Rica as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities between Costa Rica and Latvia?
- 1.1, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Costa Rica and Latvia rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities?
- Costa Rica ranks 14th and Latvia ranks 12th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities (normalized). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.