Estonia vs Iceland: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities over time
- Estonia
- Iceland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 75.25 against 69.22 in Estonia, a difference of 6.03.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Estonia ahead.
Estonia ranks 35th and Iceland ranks 32nd of 37 countries.
Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 68.28 | 65.14 | 3.13 | Estonia |
| 2010s | 84.66 | 82.01 | 2.65 | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities, Estonia or Iceland?
- Iceland, at 75.25 against 69.22 in Estonia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities between Estonia and Iceland?
- 6.03, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Iceland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Estonia and Iceland rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities?
- Estonia ranks 35th and Iceland ranks 32nd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities (normalized). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.