Hong Kong vs Slovenia: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities
Hong Kong
126.3
in 2018
Slovenia
120.81
in 2018
Hong Kong rank
17th
Slovenia rank
18th
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities over time
- Hong Kong
- Slovenia
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 126.3 against 120.81 in Slovenia, a difference of 5.49.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 13 shared years of data; in 2006 it was Slovenia ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 17th and Slovenia ranks 18th of 37 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Slovenia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 135.08 | 125.8 | 9.27 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 145.44 | 128.95 | 16.49 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities, Hong Kong or Slovenia?
- Hong Kong, at 126.3 against 120.81 in Slovenia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities between Hong Kong and Slovenia?
- 5.49, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Slovenia?
- 13 years are reported by both, from 2006 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong and Slovenia rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities?
- Hong Kong ranks 17th and Slovenia ranks 18th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.