Iceland vs Ireland: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities over time
- Iceland
- Ireland
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 71.18 against 49.96 in Ireland, a difference of 21.22.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.4 times Ireland's.
Across all 14 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 29th and Ireland ranks 32nd of 37 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Ireland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 73.51 | 35.75 | 37.76 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 77.58 | 31.33 | 46.25 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities, Iceland or Ireland?
- Iceland, at 71.18 against 49.96 in Ireland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities between Iceland and Ireland?
- 21.22, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Ireland?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Ireland rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities?
- Iceland ranks 29th and Ireland ranks 32nd of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.