Iceland vs Malta: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities
Iceland
71.18
in 2018
Malta
75.1
in 2018
Iceland rank
29th
Malta rank
27th
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities over time
- Iceland
- Malta
How they compare
Malta currently reports 75.1 against 71.18 in Iceland, a difference of 3.92.
That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
Across all 9 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 29th and Malta ranks 27th of 37 countries.
Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities, Iceland or Malta?
- Malta, at 75.1 against 71.18 in Iceland as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities between Iceland and Malta?
- 3.92, with Malta ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Malta?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2010 to 2018.
- How do Iceland and Malta rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities?
- Iceland ranks 29th and Malta ranks 27th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.