Philippines vs Tunisia: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities over time
- Philippines
- Tunisia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 474.59 against 309.98 in Tunisia, a difference of 164.61.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.5 times Tunisia's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2005 it was Philippines ahead.
Philippines ranks 2nd and Tunisia ranks 5th of 37 countries.
Philippines has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 309.45 | 254.81 | 54.64 | Philippines |
| 2010s | 352.64 | 275.01 | 77.63 | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities, Philippines or Tunisia?
- Philippines, at 474.59 against 309.98 in Tunisia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities between Philippines and Tunisia?
- 164.61, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Tunisia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2005 to 2018.
- How do Philippines and Tunisia rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions intensities?
- Philippines ranks 2nd and Tunisia ranks 5th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions intensities. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.