Costa Rica vs Tunisia: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers
Costa Rica
99.8
in 2018
Tunisia
104.63
in 2018
Costa Rica rank
8th
Tunisia rank
7th
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers over time
- Costa Rica
- Tunisia
How they compare
Tunisia currently reports 104.63 against 99.8 in Costa Rica, a difference of 4.83.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Costa Rica ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 8th and Tunisia ranks 7th of 37 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Tunisia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 221.21 | 78.97 | 142.25 | Costa Rica |
| 2010s | 128.97 | 94.91 | 34.06 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers, Costa Rica or Tunisia?
- Tunisia, at 104.63 against 99.8 in Costa Rica as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers between Costa Rica and Tunisia?
- 4.83, with Tunisia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Tunisia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Costa Rica and Tunisia rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers?
- Costa Rica ranks 8th and Tunisia ranks 7th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers (normalized). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.