Hong Kong vs Latvia: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers (normalized)
Hong Kong
87.63
in 2018
Latvia
88.77
in 2018
Hong Kong rank
18th
Latvia rank
15th
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers (normalized) over time
- Hong Kong
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 88.77 against 87.63 in Hong Kong, a difference of 1.14.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 18th and Latvia ranks 15th of 37 countries.
Hong Kong has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 112.99 | 80.69 | 32.29 | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | 102.05 | 94.72 | 7.34 | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers, Hong Kong or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 88.77 against 87.63 in Hong Kong as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers between Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 1.14, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong and Latvia rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers?
- Hong Kong ranks 18th and Latvia ranks 15th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers (normalized). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.