Latvia vs Switzerland: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers
Latvia
88.77
in 2018
Switzerland
92.08
in 2018
Latvia rank
15th
Switzerland rank
12th
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers over time
- Latvia
- Switzerland
How they compare
Switzerland currently reports 92.08 against 88.77 in Latvia, a difference of 3.31.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Switzerland has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 15th and Switzerland ranks 12th of 37 countries.
Switzerland has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Switzerland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 87.24 | 137.56 | 50.32 | Switzerland |
| 2010s | 94.72 | 107.52 | 12.8 | Switzerland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers, Latvia or Switzerland?
- Switzerland, at 92.08 against 88.77 in Latvia as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers between Latvia and Switzerland?
- 3.31, with Switzerland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Switzerland?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 2009 to 2018.
- How do Latvia and Switzerland rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers?
- Latvia ranks 15th and Switzerland ranks 12th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers (normalized). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.