Czechia vs South Korea: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers over time
- Czechia
- South Korea
How they compare
Czechia currently reports 321.06 against 288.87 in South Korea, a difference of 32.19.
That makes Czechia's figure about 1.1 times South Korea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 2008 it was South Korea ahead.
Czechia ranks 11th and South Korea ranks 13th of 37 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and South Korea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | South Korea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 307.04 | 382 | 74.96 | South Korea |
| 2010s | 367.75 | 322.17 | 45.57 | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers, Czechia or South Korea?
- Czechia, at 321.06 against 288.87 in South Korea as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers between Czechia and South Korea?
- 32.19, with Czechia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and South Korea?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 2008 to 2018.
- How do Czechia and South Korea rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers?
- Czechia ranks 11th and South Korea ranks 13th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.