Hong Kong, China vs Peru: Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers
Hong Kong, China
220
in 2018
Peru
228.94
in 2018
Hong Kong, China rank
16th
Peru rank
15th
Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers over time
- Hong Kong, China
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 228.94 against 220 in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 8.94.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 12 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Peru ahead.
Hong Kong, China ranks 16th and Peru ranks 15th of 37 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong, China | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 287.07 | 317.7 | 30.63 | Peru |
| 2010s | 256.2 | 299.44 | 43.24 | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers, Hong Kong, China or Peru?
- Peru, at 228.94 against 220 in Hong Kong, China as of 2018.
- What is the difference in carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers between Hong Kong, China and Peru?
- 8.94, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Peru?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2018.
- How do Hong Kong, China and Peru rank globally for carbon footprint of bank loans, emissions multipliers?
- Hong Kong, China ranks 16th and Peru ranks 15th of 37 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Monetary Fund, published as Carbon Footprint of Bank Loans, Emissions multipliers. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
This dataset is designed to measure the carbon footprint of bank loans, which is a crucial component for understanding the environmental impact of financial portfolios. Bank loans provide finance to industries with varying degrees of carbon intensities. The footprint of bank loans contributes to the disclosure of the carbon intensity of the loans portfolio.