Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Chile: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Chile
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 2.2% against 2.1% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Bosnia and Herzegovina's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 9 times across 28 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Chile ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 89th and Chile ranks 91st of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Bosnia and Herzegovina averaged higher in 1 and Chile in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -0.5% | 2.2% | 2.7% | Chile |
| 2000s | -2.8% | -0.6% | 2.2% | Chile |
| 2010s | 0.7% | 0.3% | 0.3% | Bosnia and Herzegovina |
| 2020s | 1.0% | 2.1% | 1.1% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Chile?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 2.2% against 2.1% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
- 0.1%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile?
- 28 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2025.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Chile rank globally for claims on central government?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 89th and Chile ranks 91st of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.