Brunei Darussalam vs Ecuador: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Brunei Darussalam
- Ecuador
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports -0.1% against -0.1% in Brunei Darussalam, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 2000 it was Brunei Darussalam ahead.
Brunei Darussalam ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 117th of 167 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Brunei Darussalam averaged higher in 1 and Ecuador in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Brunei Darussalam | Ecuador | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | -1.0% | -8.1% | 7.1% | Brunei Darussalam |
| 2010s | -0.0% | 1.5% | 1.5% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.6% | 0.9% | 0.4% | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Brunei Darussalam or Ecuador?
- Ecuador, at -0.1% against -0.1% in Brunei Darussalam as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Brunei Darussalam and Ecuador?
- 0.0%, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Brunei Darussalam and Ecuador?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 2000 to 2025.
- How do Brunei Darussalam and Ecuador rank globally for claims on central government?
- Brunei Darussalam ranks 118th and Ecuador ranks 117th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.