Chile vs Israel: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Chile
- Israel
How they compare
Israel currently reports 2.2% against 2.1% in Chile, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Israel's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 21 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1962 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 91st and Israel ranks 90th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Israel in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Israel | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 29.8% | 4.6% | 25.2% | Chile |
| 1970s | 341.5% | 59.3% | 282.1% | Chile |
| 1980s | 21.1% | 200.4% | 179.3% | Israel |
| 1990s | 0.1% | -1.0% | 1.1% | Chile |
| 2000s | -0.6% | 0.4% | 1.0% | Israel |
| 2010s | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Chile |
| 2020s | 2.1% | 2.3% | 0.2% | Israel |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Chile or Israel?
- Israel, at 2.2% against 2.1% in Chile as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Chile and Israel?
- 0.1%, with Israel ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Israel?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1962 to 2025.
- How do Chile and Israel rank globally for claims on central government?
- Chile ranks 91st and Israel ranks 90th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.