Ecuador vs Malaysia: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Ecuador
- Malaysia
How they compare
Malaysia currently reports -0.0% against -0.1% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 35 times across 65 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Ecuador ahead.
Ecuador ranks 117th and Malaysia ranks 114th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 3 and Malaysia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Malaysia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.2% | 1.9% | 2.3% | Ecuador |
| 1970s | -1.7% | 7.5% | 9.1% | Malaysia |
| 1980s | 1.4% | 5.0% | 3.6% | Malaysia |
| 1990s | 6.3% | -3.7% | 10.0% | Ecuador |
| 2000s | -8.1% | 1.1% | 9.2% | Malaysia |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 0.8% | 0.7% | Ecuador |
| 2020s | 0.9% | 1.5% | 0.6% | Malaysia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Ecuador or Malaysia?
- Malaysia, at -0.0% against -0.1% in Ecuador as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 0.1%, with Malaysia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Malaysia?
- 65 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Malaysia rank globally for claims on central government?
- Ecuador ranks 117th and Malaysia ranks 114th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.