Grenada vs Zimbabwe: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Grenada
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 92.3% against 68.3% in Grenada, a difference of 24.0%.
That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.4 times Grenada's.
The two have swapped places 16 times across 40 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Zimbabwe ahead.
Grenada ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 167 countries.
Across the 5 decades both report, Grenada averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Grenada | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 3.1% | 7.5% | 4.4% | Zimbabwe |
| 1990s | -0.1% | -0.2% | 0.0% | Grenada |
| 2000s | 0.0% | 21.7% | 21.7% | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | -1.9% | 19.0% | 20.9% | Zimbabwe |
| 2020s | -2.1% | 44.4% | 46.5% | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Grenada or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 92.3% against 68.3% in Grenada as of 2023.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Grenada and Zimbabwe?
- 24.0%, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Grenada and Zimbabwe?
- 40 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2023.
- How do Grenada and Zimbabwe rank globally for claims on central government?
- Grenada ranks 4th and Zimbabwe ranks 2nd of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.