Guinea vs Malawi: Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money)
Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money) over time
- Guinea
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 49.2% against 22.2% in Guinea, a difference of 27.0%.
That makes Malawi's figure about 2.2 times Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 12 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Malawi ahead.
Guinea ranks 8th and Malawi ranks 5th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Guinea averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.1% | 6.5% | 4.5% | Malawi |
| 2000s | 22.6% | 20.2% | 2.4% | Guinea |
| 2010s | 12.2% | 8.1% | 4.0% | Guinea |
| 2020s | 10.3% | 39.4% | 29.1% | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Guinea or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 49.2% against 22.2% in Guinea as of 2024.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Guinea and Malawi?
- 27.0%, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea and Malawi?
- 31 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2024.
- How do Guinea and Malawi rank globally for claims on central government?
- Guinea ranks 8th and Malawi ranks 5th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.