Honduras vs Hong Kong: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Honduras
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Honduras currently reports 0.8% against 0.4% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Honduras's figure about 2.0 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 19 times across 34 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Honduras ranks 103rd and Hong Kong ranks 105th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Honduras averaged higher in 3 and Hong Kong in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Honduras | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | -6.8% | -1.0% | 5.9% | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 2.0% | 0.9% | 1.0% | Honduras |
| 2010s | -0.8% | -1.6% | 0.8% | Honduras |
| 2020s | 1.3% | 0.8% | 0.5% | Honduras |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Honduras or Hong Kong?
- Honduras, at 0.8% against 0.4% in Hong Kong as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Honduras and Hong Kong?
- 0.4%, with Honduras ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Honduras and Hong Kong?
- 34 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2025.
- How do Honduras and Hong Kong rank globally for claims on central government?
- Honduras ranks 103rd and Hong Kong ranks 105th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.