Hong Kong vs Tajikistan: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Hong Kong
- Tajikistan
How they compare
Hong Kong currently reports 0.4% against 0.2% in Tajikistan, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Hong Kong's figure about 2.1 times Tajikistan's.
The two have swapped places 10 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1999 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Hong Kong ranks 105th and Tajikistan ranks 108th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong averaged higher in 3 and Tajikistan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hong Kong | Tajikistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.4% | -73.2% | 75.6% | Hong Kong |
| 2000s | 0.9% | -12.3% | 13.2% | Hong Kong |
| 2010s | -1.6% | 0.9% | 2.5% | Tajikistan |
| 2020s | 0.8% | -4.4% | 5.2% | Hong Kong |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Hong Kong or Tajikistan?
- Hong Kong, at 0.4% against 0.2% in Tajikistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Hong Kong and Tajikistan?
- 0.2%, with Hong Kong ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong and Tajikistan?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1999 to 2023.
- How do Hong Kong and Tajikistan rank globally for claims on central government?
- Hong Kong ranks 105th and Tajikistan ranks 108th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.