Hungary vs Mozambique: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Hungary
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 5.1% against 4.8% in Hungary, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Hungary's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 35 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Hungary ahead.
Hungary ranks 56th and Mozambique ranks 54th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Hungary averaged higher in 2 and Mozambique in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Hungary | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 20.5% | -14.5% | 35.0% | Hungary |
| 2000s | -1.0% | -0.8% | 0.3% | Mozambique |
| 2010s | 2.7% | 2.0% | 0.8% | Hungary |
| 2020s | 3.8% | 7.4% | 3.6% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Hungary or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 5.1% against 4.8% in Hungary as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Hungary and Mozambique?
- 0.3%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Hungary and Mozambique?
- 35 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2024.
- How do Hungary and Mozambique rank globally for claims on central government?
- Hungary ranks 56th and Mozambique ranks 54th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.