Norway vs Sweden: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Norway
- Sweden
How they compare
Sweden currently reports -0.9% against -0.9% in Norway, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 23 times across 64 shared years of data; in 1961 it was Norway ahead.
Norway ranks 130th and Sweden ranks 129th of 167 countries.
Across the 7 decades both report, Norway averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Norway | Sweden | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.5% | 0.6% | 0.9% | Norway |
| 1970s | 3.0% | 3.2% | 0.2% | Sweden |
| 1980s | -2.9% | 4.0% | 6.9% | Sweden |
| 1990s | 0.3% | -1.9% | 2.2% | Norway |
| 2000s | -2.8% | 0.5% | 3.3% | Sweden |
| 2010s | 0.3% | -0.1% | 0.3% | Norway |
| 2020s | -1.4% | 0.8% | 2.3% | Sweden |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Norway or Sweden?
- Sweden, at -0.9% against -0.9% in Norway as of 2024.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Norway and Sweden?
- 0.0%, with Sweden ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Norway and Sweden?
- 64 years are reported by both, from 1961 to 2024.
- How do Norway and Sweden rank globally for claims on central government?
- Norway ranks 130th and Sweden ranks 129th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.