Philippines vs Serbia: Claims on central government
Claims on central government over time
- Philippines
- Serbia
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 3.4% against 3.2% in Serbia, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Serbia's.
The two have swapped places 11 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Serbia ahead.
Philippines ranks 71st and Serbia ranks 74th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 2 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Philippines | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0.8% | 24.4% | 23.6% | Serbia |
| 2000s | 2.0% | -0.7% | 2.7% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 1.3% | 1.6% | 0.3% | Serbia |
| 2020s | 4.2% | -1.5% | 5.7% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on central government, Philippines or Serbia?
- Philippines, at 3.4% against 3.2% in Serbia as of 2023.
- What is the difference in claims on central government between Philippines and Serbia?
- 0.2%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and Serbia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2023.
- How do Philippines and Serbia rank globally for claims on central government?
- Philippines ranks 71st and Serbia ranks 74th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on central government (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on central government include loans to central government institutions net of deposits. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.