Botswana vs Hong Kong: Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy
Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy over time
- Botswana
- Hong Kong
How they compare
Botswana currently reports 1.9% against 1.6% in Hong Kong, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Botswana's figure about 1.2 times Hong Kong's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Hong Kong ahead.
Botswana ranks 125th and Hong Kong ranks 127th of 151 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Botswana averaged higher in 1 and Hong Kong in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Botswana | Hong Kong | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 5.4% | 6.1% | 0.7% | Hong Kong |
| 2020s | 4.6% | 1.2% | 3.4% | Botswana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on other sectors of the domestic economy, Botswana or Hong Kong?
- Botswana, at 1.9% against 1.6% in Hong Kong as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on other sectors of the domestic economy between Botswana and Hong Kong?
- 0.3%, with Botswana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Hong Kong?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Botswana and Hong Kong rank globally for claims on other sectors of the domestic economy?
- Botswana ranks 125th and Hong Kong ranks 127th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on other sectors of the domestic economy include gross credit from the financial system to households, nonprofit institutions serving households, nonfinancial corporations, state and local governments, and social security funds. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.