Belarus vs Timor-Leste: Claims on private sector
Claims on private sector over time
- Belarus
- Timor-Leste
How they compare
Timor-Leste currently reports 7.1% against 7.0% in Belarus, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 2003 it was Belarus ahead.
Belarus ranks 57th and Timor-Leste ranks 56th of 167 countries.
Belarus has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belarus | Timor-Leste | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 46.1% | 24.4% | 21.6% | Belarus |
| 2010s | 22.0% | 3.6% | 18.4% | Belarus |
| 2020s | 10.2% | 2.5% | 7.7% | Belarus |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on private sector, Belarus or Timor-Leste?
- Timor-Leste, at 7.1% against 7.0% in Belarus as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on private sector between Belarus and Timor-Leste?
- 0.1%, with Timor-Leste ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Timor-Leste?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 2003 to 2021.
- How do Belarus and Timor-Leste rank globally for claims on private sector?
- Belarus ranks 57th and Timor-Leste ranks 56th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on private sector include gross credit from the financial system to individuals, enterprises, nonfinancial public entities not included under net domestic credit, and financial institutions not included elsewhere. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.