Bosnia and Herzegovina vs Oman: Claims on private sector
Claims on private sector over time
- Bosnia and Herzegovina
- Oman
How they compare
Bosnia and Herzegovina currently reports 6.2% against 6.1% in Oman, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 21 shared years of data; in 1998 it was Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 67th and Oman ranks 69th of 167 countries.
Oman has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Bosnia and Herzegovina | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 10.2% | 14.8% | 4.6% | Oman |
| 2000s | 9.9% | 12.8% | 2.9% | Oman |
| 2010s | 3.1% | 12.0% | 8.9% | Oman |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on private sector, Bosnia and Herzegovina or Oman?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina, at 6.2% against 6.1% in Oman as of 2025.
- What is the difference in claims on private sector between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Oman?
- 0.1%, with Bosnia and Herzegovina ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Bosnia and Herzegovina and Oman?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1998 to 2018.
- How do Bosnia and Herzegovina and Oman rank globally for claims on private sector?
- Bosnia and Herzegovina ranks 67th and Oman ranks 69th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on private sector include gross credit from the financial system to individuals, enterprises, nonfinancial public entities not included under net domestic credit, and financial institutions not included elsewhere. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.