Czechia vs Namibia: Claims on private sector
Claims on private sector over time
- Czechia
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 3.4% against 3.3% in Czechia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 29 shared years of data; in 1994 it was Namibia ahead.
Czechia ranks 116th and Namibia ranks 114th of 167 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Czechia averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Czechia | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.7% | 17.8% | 9.2% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 2.5% | 16.5% | 13.9% | Namibia |
| 2010s | 3.3% | 9.5% | 6.3% | Namibia |
| 2020s | 3.3% | 2.1% | 1.2% | Czechia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher claims on private sector, Czechia or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 3.4% against 3.3% in Czechia as of 2022.
- What is the difference in claims on private sector between Czechia and Namibia?
- 0.1%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Czechia and Namibia?
- 29 years are reported by both, from 1994 to 2022.
- How do Czechia and Namibia rank globally for claims on private sector?
- Czechia ranks 116th and Namibia ranks 114th of 167 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Financial Statistics database, International Monetary Fund (IMF), published as Claims on private sector (annual growth as % of broad money). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Claims on private sector include gross credit from the financial system to individuals, enterprises, nonfinancial public entities not included under net domestic credit, and financial institutions not included elsewhere. Broad money is the sum of all liquid financial instruments held by money-holding sectors that are widely accepted in an economy as a medium of exchange, plus those that can be converted into a medium of exchange at short notice at, or close to, their full nominal value. This indicator represents the annual percentage growth in the ratio of claims to broad money.